Written By
Sheikh Hasib Ahmed
image credit: Getty Images
On Tuesday, a New Jersey appeals court overturned a jury's $223.8 million judgment against Johnson & Johnson in favor of four plaintiffs who contended they contracted cancer after being exposed to asbestos in the firm's talc powder products.
image credit: Getty Images
The Superior Court of New Jersey's Appellate Division determined that the trial judge in the lower court erred in allowing part of the plaintiffs' scientific expert testimony to be presented to the jury.
image credit: Getty Images
Erik Haas, vice president of investigations at J&J Worldwide, said that the decision "resoundingly dismisses the 'junk science' presented by purported "experts" paid by the majority of the tort asbestos bar."
image credit: Getty Images
The business was ordered by the jury to pay $37.2 million in compensatory damages and $750 million in punitive damages, though California law automatically reduced those sums to $186.5 million.
image credit: Getty Images
Jacqueline Moline, one of those specialists, is being sued separately by J&J for a 2019 report that she co-authored. The judgment made on Tuesday did not involve that study.
image credit: Getty Images
The action, according to Moline, who has testified for plaintiffs in more than 200 talc cancer cases, is an attempt to "intimidate" scientific experts and keep them from testifying against the firm.
image credit: Getty Images
More than 38,000 cases against J&J claim that its talc products, including Johnson's baby powder, may include asbestos and that they are to blame for illnesses like ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, a type of cancer associated with asbestos exposure.
image credit: Getty Images
The lawsuits have a mixed success history, with notable plaintiff victories including a $2.1 billion verdict granted to 22 ovarian cancer patients.
image credit: Getty Images
A $117 million verdict in the identical New Jersey appeals court as well as a $120 million verdict in New York had just been overturned in instances where J&J had previously lost.
image credit: Getty Images
The firm's most recent victory follows its second failure in July to transfer tens of thousands of talc-related claims into bankruptcy court, where it sought to settle them through a proposed $8.9 billion deal.
image credit: Getty Images
Trials can now proceed after having generally been put on hold when J&J filed a bankruptcy case.
image credit: Getty Images
A California man who was terminally sick received a $18.8 million verdict in one trial that was permitted while the bankruptcy case was active.
image credit: Getty Images
The cost of J&J's talc-related judgments, settlements, and legal bills, according to the company, has amounted to nearly $4.5 billion.